MYP 3 · Maths

EQUATIONS

Maintaining balance

QUESTION 1 [3 marks] — Criterion A Medium
Solve $x-8=15$, explaining the balance operation used at each step.
a. State what operation must be performed to BOTH sides to isolate $x$, and why.
[2]
Show Solution
Add 8 to both sides. This is needed because the equation must stay 'balanced' — whatever is done to one side must be done to the other, to keep both sides equal.
b. Complete the solution.
[1]
Show Solution
$$x-8+8=15+8 \Rightarrow x=23$$
QUESTION 2 [3 marks] — Criterion A Medium
Solve $\dfrac{x}{5}+3=9$, showing the balance operation used at each of the two steps.
a. Perform the first balancing step (removing the $+3$).
[2]
Show Solution
Subtract 3 from both sides: $$\frac{x}{5}=6$$
b. Perform the second balancing step to fully isolate $x$.
[1]
Show Solution
Multiply both sides by 5: $$x=30$$
QUESTION 3 [5 marks] — Criterion B Medium
Investigate what happens to an equation's balance if you perform an operation on only ONE side.
a. Start with the true equation $10=10$. Add 5 to ONLY the left side. Is the resulting statement still true?
[2]
Show Solution
$10+5=10 \Rightarrow 15=10$ — this is FALSE. Adding to only one side breaks the equality.
b. Now add 5 to BOTH sides of $10=10$. Is this still true?
[1]
Show Solution
$10+5=10+5 \Rightarrow 15=15$ — TRUE, the balance is maintained.
c. Explain why this simple demonstration justifies the rule 'always do the same operation to both sides' when solving equations.
[2]
Show Solution
Since an equation represents a true balance between two equal quantities, any operation applied to only one side will generally destroy that balance (as shown), while applying the SAME operation to both sides preserves it — this is why balance must always be maintained on both sides throughout solving.
QUESTION 4 [5 marks] — Criterion C Medium
A student solving $x+6=14$ writes: 'I'll just move the 6 to the other side and change its sign, getting $x=14-6=8$' without mentioning balance at all.
a. Explain how the student's 'move it and change the sign' shortcut is actually just a quick way of describing the balance operation (subtracting 6 from both sides).
[3]
Show Solution
Subtracting 6 from BOTH sides gives $x+6-6=14-6$, which simplifies to $x=8$. The '6' effectively disappears from the left side and reappears as '$-6$' on the right — this is exactly what 'moving it and changing the sign' describes, just using balance-operation language instead of a shortcut phrase.
b. Explain why understanding the BALANCE reasoning (not just the shortcut) becomes important for more complex equations later on.
[2]
Show Solution
The shortcut can become confusing or lead to errors in more complex equations (e.g. those with fractions, brackets, or the variable on both sides), where it's not always obvious what should 'move'. Understanding the underlying balance principle ensures the method can be applied correctly and confidently to ANY equation, not just simple ones.
QUESTION 5 [4 marks] — Criterion D Medium
A see-saw is perfectly balanced with a 40 kg weight on one side and an unknown combination of weights ($x$ kg plus a fixed 15 kg weight) on the other side, so $x+15=40$.
a. Using the balance analogy directly (removing equal weight from both sides), find $x$.
[2]
Show Solution
Removing 15 kg from both sides keeps the see-saw balanced: $x=40-15=25$ kg.
b. Explain how this physical see-saw scenario directly mirrors the algebraic rule of 'doing the same operation to both sides' of an equation.
[2]
Show Solution
Just as removing the same amount of weight from both sides of a physically balanced see-saw keeps it balanced, performing the same mathematical operation on both sides of an equation keeps the equality true — the see-saw is a physical illustration of exactly the same balance principle used in algebra.
QUESTION 6 [3 marks] — Criterion A Easy
Solve $\dfrac{x}{4}-3=6$, explaining the balance operation at each of the two steps.
a. Perform the first balancing step.
[2]
Show Solution
Add 3 to both sides: $$\frac{x}{4}=9$$
b. Perform the second balancing step to fully isolate $x$.
[1]
Show Solution
Multiply both sides by 4: $$x=36$$
QUESTION 7 [5 marks] — Criterion B Medium
Investigate whether the ORDER of balance operations matters when solving $2x+6=20$ — specifically, does it matter whether you SUBTRACT 6 first, or DIVIDE by 2 first?
a. Solve by subtracting 6 from both sides FIRST, then dividing by 2.
[2]
Show Solution
$2x=14 \Rightarrow x=7$.
b. Now solve by dividing EVERY term by 2 first (giving $x+3=10$), then subtracting 3. Confirm you reach the same answer, and explain why BOTH valid orderings of balance operations must always lead to the same correct solution.
[3]
Show Solution
$x+3=10 \Rightarrow x=7$ — matches. Both orderings work because each step, regardless of order, is a VALID balanced operation (applied equally to both sides) — as long as every step maintains the equality, the final isolated value of $x$ must be the same, since balanced operations never change WHICH value of $x$ makes the equation true, only how the equation is temporarily expressed along the way.
QUESTION 8 [6 marks] — Criterion C Medium
A student solving $5x-2=3x+8$ says: 'I'll just move everything to one side by adding $2-3x-8$ to both sides all at once, since I can do multiple things in one step.'
a. Explain why combining MULTIPLE balance operations into a single step, while mathematically valid IN PRINCIPLE, can be RISKY for someone still learning to solve equations, and suggest what could go wrong.
[3]
Show Solution
While it IS valid to perform multiple balanced operations at once (as long as they're applied identically to both sides), doing so increases the risk of ARITHMETIC ERRORS — combining several sign changes and term movements in one step makes it harder to spot mistakes, and harder for a reader (or the student themselves, checking their own work) to verify each individual step was done correctly. Breaking the process into smaller, clearly labelled steps reduces error risk, especially while still building confidence with the method.
b. Demonstrate the SAME solution using clear, SEPARATE balance steps instead, to show a safer approach.
[3]
Show Solution
Step 1 (subtract $3x$ from both sides): $2x-2=8$. Step 2 (add 2 to both sides): $2x=10$. Step 3 (divide by 2): $x=5$. Each step is a single, clearly checkable balanced operation.
QUESTION 9 [5 marks] — Criterion C Medium
A student solving $2(x+5)=3(x-1)$ writes only: '2x+10=3x-3, x=13' with no intermediate steps shown for HOW they moved from the expanded equation to the final answer.
a. Fill in the MISSING intermediate balance steps between '$2x+10=3x-3$' and 'x=13', showing each operation clearly.
[3]
Show Solution
$2x+10=3x-3$. Subtract $2x$ from both sides: $10=x-3$. Add 3 to both sides: $13=x$, i.e. $x=13$.
b. Verify $x=13$ is correct by substituting into the ORIGINAL (unexpanded) equation.
[2]
Show Solution
$2(13+5)=2(18)=36$. $3(13-1)=3(12)=36$ ? — both sides equal 36.
QUESTION 10 [6 marks] — Criterion D Medium
A weighing scale used in a pharmacy is balanced with a container of unknown TOTAL mass (container + contents) $x$ grams plus a fixed 15g weight on one side, and a 47g reference weight on the other side, so $x+15=47$.
a. Using the balance principle directly (removing equal mass from both sides), find $x$, the total mass of the container and its contents.
[2]
Show Solution
Removing 15g from both sides: $x=47-15=32$g.
b. The empty container alone (with no contents) is known to weigh 9g. Find the mass of the contents ALONE, and determine whether it meets the prescription requirement of exactly 25g.
[4]
Show Solution
Contents mass $=x-\text{empty container mass}=32-9=23$g. Since $23\text{g}\ne25\text{g}$ (and is actually LESS), the contents do NOT meet the required 25g — the pharmacist would need to add approximately 2 more grams of contents.